THE HOLY LAND; the place with the purest oil in the world, and what they're going to do with it

http://www.spaceandmotion.com

Libya, now known as a holy land, as the democratic powers form in another imperialist like league in their hunt for oil. Primarily involved is the French President Mr. Sarkozy.

Libyan oil is actually the purest in the world because it does not require, a second process to enhance it as oil from other countries needs. Thus, the power holders of the world are now very keen to get their hands on this god foresaken place called Libya.

In this bid for more oil, and now added onto that slogan "better oil", Obama (the beloved president that he is), may not be holding his hand out for Libya at all but could in turn be seen as an oil mongorer type personality, like that of George W. Bush.

It can be understood why Mr. Sarkozy wants all this oil, sure France has had its downward moments in history. But now they want to step above the US trenches and gain some oil for themselves; for France, the "gold" of the 21st century I suppose. So in turn these presidents fighting for their countries will power and "gold", can also be seen as "gold diggers" or in this case perhaps "oil diggers".

In America's bid for democracy worldwide, once again, bringing up the Truman Doctrine "we have a duty to protect the free nations of the world (aiding small nations under violent, corrupt, and unjust rule)"-it is not difficult to understand Obama's motive for moving into Libya, but the truth is Libya could turn out to be another Iran or Afghanistan, in worse circumstances maybe even like Iraq. The point is once a country or a few countries decide to mobilize; bring their troops into the place, they can't just get the freakin' hell out of there, they need to help build the government ground up after defeating the Gadhafi forces. Thus, the future of the Libyan nation is now in the hands of capitalist France, USA, and Britain. All these countries were once well known colonizers as well, would it be surprising to say that the new diminishing of terrorist states, like Libya, or Iraq; is just a new way of colonizing, may the term "terronizing be suggested"?

Well leave it to the big three here to decide who is terrorizing who, personally there is lots of irony in the current situation in Libya, and not just from one perspective either.